Status: Draft | In Review | Approved | Implemented | Deprecated Author(s): [Name 1, Name 2] Reviewers: [Name 1, Name 2] Created: [YYYY-MM-DD] Last Updated: [YYYY-MM-DD] Sign-off Deadline: [YYYY-MM-DD] Implementation Target: [Quarter/Sprint]
- Product Requirements: [Link to PRD]
- Proposal: [Link if this evolved from a proposal]
- Related Designs: [Links to connected design docs]
[One paragraph summary: What are we building, why it matters, expected outcome, timeline, and resource requirement]
This document describes the technical approach for [project name] which aims to [primary goal]. The proposed solution involves [high-level approach] and is expected to [key benefit/metric]. Implementation is planned for [timeline] with an estimated effort of [rough estimate].
Key Drivers:
- [Driver 1: e.g., User feedback, market opportunity, technical debt]
- [Driver 2]
- [Driver 3]
| Metric | Current State | Target | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| [e.g., API response time] | [500ms] | [<100ms] | [New Relic monitoring] |
| [e.g., User engagement] | [30%] | [50%] | [Analytics dashboard] |
For full product requirements, see Product Requirements Doc.
Core Requirements:
- [Requirement 1] - [Brief description]
- [Requirement 2] - [Brief description]
- [Requirement 3] - [Brief description]
- [Goal 1: What we're trying to achieve]
- [Goal 2]
- [Goal 3]
- [Non-goal 1: What we're intentionally not doing]
- [Non-goal 2]
- [Non-goal 3]
Why these are non-goals: [Brief explanation of why these are excluded]
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| [Term 1] | [Clear definition] |
| [API] | [What it means in this context] |
| [Acronym] | [What it stands for] |
[ASCII diagram or link to diagram showing current architecture]
- Limitation 1: [Description and impact]
- Limitation 2: [Description and impact]
- Limitation 3: [Description and impact]
We will solve this by [high-level approach]. This involves:
- [Step 1] - [Brief explanation]
- [Step 2] - [Brief explanation]
- [Step 3] - [Brief explanation]
[ASCII diagram, Mermaid diagram, or link to diagram]
Example with Mermaid:
```mermaid
graph TD
A[User] -->|Request| B[API Gateway]
B --> C[Service Layer]
C --> D[Database]
### Component Design
#### Component 1: [Name]
**Purpose:** [What this component does]
**Technology:** [Language, framework, libraries]
**Key Responsibilities:**
- [Responsibility 1]
- [Responsibility 2]
**Interfaces:**
- **Input:** [What it receives]
- **Output:** [What it produces]
#### Component 2: [Name]
**Purpose:**
**Technology:**
**Key Responsibilities:**
**Interfaces:**
### Data Model Changes
<!-- Database schema changes, new tables, modified fields -->
#### New Tables
**Table: `[table_name]`**
| Column | Type | Constraints | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|-------------|
| id | UUID | PRIMARY KEY | Unique identifier |
| [column] | [type] | [constraints] | [description] |
#### Modified Tables
**Changes to `[existing_table]`:**
- **Add:** `[new_column]` ([type]) - [description]
- **Modify:** `[existing_column]` - [what's changing and why]
- **Remove:** `[deprecated_column]` - [migration plan]
### API Design
<!-- API endpoints, request/response formats -->
#### New Endpoints
**`POST /api/v1/[resource]`**
**Purpose:** [What this endpoint does]
**Request:**
```json
{
"field1": "value",
"field2": 123
}
Response (200 OK):
{
"id": "uuid",
"status": "success",
"data": {}
}Error Responses:
400 Bad Request- Invalid input401 Unauthorized- Authentication required500 Internal Server Error- Server error
Changes to GET /api/v1/[resource]:
- [What's changing and why]
- Authentication: [How users/services authenticate]
- Authorization: [Access control approach]
- Data Encryption: [In transit and at rest]
- Input Validation: [How we prevent injection attacks]
- Rate Limiting: [Preventing abuse]
- Secrets Management: [How API keys/credentials are stored]
Security Review Required: Yes / No Reviewer: [Security team member]
Expected Load:
- [X requests per second]
- [Y concurrent users]
- [Z data volume]
Performance Optimizations:
- [Optimization 1: e.g., Caching strategy]
- [Optimization 2: e.g., Database indexing]
- [Optimization 3: e.g., Async processing]
Scaling Strategy:
- Horizontal: [How we add more instances]
- Vertical: [Resource limits per instance]
Description: [How this approach would work]
Pros:
Cons:
Why Not Chosen: [Clear reasoning]
Description:
Pros:
Cons:
Why Not Chosen:
Impact of Not Implementing:
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Technical risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | [How we'll prevent/handle it] | [Name] |
| [Timeline risk] | ||||
| [Resource risk] |
- [Step 1] - [Action to take]
- [Step 2] - [Action to take]
- [Step 3] - [Action to take]
Rollback Triggers:
- [Condition that would require rollback]
- [Metric threshold for rollback]
Unit Tests:
- [Component/module to test]
- [Target coverage: e.g., 80%]
Integration Tests:
- [System interactions to test]
- [Key workflows to validate]
End-to-End Tests:
- [User flows to test]
- [Critical paths to validate]
Performance Tests:
- [Load testing approach]
- [Stress testing scenarios]
- [Feature X in Chrome, Firefox, Safari]
- [Mobile responsiveness]
- [Error handling flows]
- [Edge cases]
- Local: [How developers test locally]
- Staging: [Pre-production environment]
- Canary: [Limited production rollout]
Timeline: [Dates or duration] Goal: [What this phase accomplishes]
Tasks:
- [Task 1]
- [Task 2]
- [Task 3]
Deliverables:
- [Deliverable 1]
- [Deliverable 2]
Success Criteria:
- [How we know Phase 1 is complete]
Timeline: Goal:
Tasks:
Deliverables:
Success Criteria:
Timeline: Goal:
Tasks:
Deliverables:
Success Criteria:
- Method: [Blue-green, canary, rolling, feature flag]
- Schedule: [When deployment will happen]
- Monitoring: [What we'll watch during rollout]
| Flag Name | Purpose | Rollout Plan |
|---|---|---|
| [flag_name] | [What it controls] | [How we'll enable it] |
- [Step 1] - [Description, duration]
- [Step 2] - [Description, duration]
- [Step 3] - [Description, duration]
Downtime Required: Yes / No If Yes: [Duration and maintenance window]
Metrics to Monitor:
- [Metric 1: e.g., Error rate]
- [Metric 2: e.g., Response time]
- [Metric 3: e.g., Resource usage]
Alerts to Configure:
- [Alert 1: Condition and threshold]
- [Alert 2: Condition and threshold]
Dashboard: [Link to monitoring dashboard]
| Role | Person | Time Commitment |
|---|---|---|
| Tech Lead | [Name] | [X weeks full-time] |
| Backend Engineer | [Name] | [Y weeks] |
| Frontend Engineer | [Name] | [Z weeks] |
| DevOps | [Name] | [A days] |
| QA | [Name] | [B days] |
- Compute: [New servers, instances, or scaling]
- Storage: [Database size, file storage needs]
- Network: [Bandwidth, CDN, etc.]
- Cost Estimate: $[amount]/month
- [New service or tool needed]
- [License or subscription required]
- [Dependency 1] - [What we need and from whom] - Status: [Blocked/In Progress/Done]
- [Dependency 2] - Status:
- [Dependency 3] - Status:
- [Team name] needs to [action] by [date]
- [Team name] needs to [action] by [date]
- [Third party] - [What we need from them]
- [Vendor] - [Integration or API access needed]
- [Update user guide]
- [Create tutorial or walkthrough]
- [Update FAQ]
- [API documentation]
- [Architecture diagrams]
- [Setup/deployment guide]
- [Runbook for operations]
- [Internal team training]
- [Support team training]
This project is complete when:
- [All acceptance criteria met]
- [Tests passing with X% coverage]
- [Performance targets achieved]
- [Documentation published]
- [Rolled out to 100% of users]
- [Monitoring in place]
Week 1:
- Monitor error rates
- Review performance metrics
- Collect user feedback
Week 2-4:
- Analyze success metrics
- Identify optimization opportunities
Post-Launch Review Date: [Date for retrospective]
-
[Question 1]
- Why It Matters: [Impact on design]
- Options: [Possible answers]
- Decision Maker: [Who decides]
- Deadline: [When we need an answer]
-
[Question 2]
- Why It Matters:
- Options:
- Decision Maker:
- Deadline:
- Tech Lead - [Name] - [Area of review]
- Engineering Manager - [Name] - [Resource/timeline approval]
- Product Manager - [Name] - [Requirements alignment]
- Security - [Name] - [Security review]
- DevOps - [Name] - [Infrastructure/deployment]
[Reviewer Name] - [Date]
[Comment or approval note]
[Reviewer Name] - [Date]
[Comment or approval note]
| Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Name] | Initial draft |
| [YYYY-MM-DD] | [Name] | [Description of changes] |
Remember: A great design doc balances thoroughness with clarity. Think through the problem, get feedback early, and iterate. The best designs come from collaboration. Aim High, Fly-Fight-Win!